Improper laundry can also cause harm to the baby, 3 tips teach you to avoid these pits

& nbsp. The wandering sun is finally back, and seeing the sun in the house early in the morning is the kind of feeling of being lucky for a long time. As a result, people who haven’t had a good laundry for more than half a month have ushered in the “big wash” day. After all, the weather forecast says that the balance of sunlight is still insufficient in the near future, and it is today for those who can wash and dry. Then roll up your sleeves and wash it! — “Wait, adults’ clothes have to be washed, and babies ’clothes have to be washed too. Can they be washed together?” — “Hand washing is too much trouble. Can I put my children ’s clothes in the washing machine?” — ​​“ I heard people say that washing clothes for children uses special detergents for babies, do you really need to be so particular? “Washing clothes for babies is something that moms do every day, but as we often tell you, “There are no small things on the baby”. Anything that our adults look sparse and ordinary, once it is related to the baby, you need to be careful, for example, washing clothes. Babies (especially babies from 0 to 3 years old) have very delicate skin, low resistance to bacteria, and improper cleaning methods. It is easy to cause skin problems such as itchy skin and red rash, which affects the baby’s health! So, what should you pay attention to when washing your baby? 1. Wash baby and adult clothes separately. Compared with babies, the crowds and environments that our adults contact are much more complicated. Inadvertently, clothes will be stained with dirt, dust, tobacco smell, and various bacteria. These may not pose a health threat to the resistant adults. However, if you wash your baby’s clothes with adults, bacteria will have a chance to contaminate your baby’s clothes, greatly increasing the baby’s chance of getting sick. After all, the skin surface of infants and young children is immature and has poor resistance. A little care will cause skin problems. Second, it is recommended to replace hand-washing with hand-washing. Many mothers usually choose to wash their baby’s clothes when hand-washing, but sometimes when there are too many clothes, they still want to use the washing machine to reduce the workload. 1. Baby clothes are usually light-colored and pure cotton, which is more suitable for gentle hand-washing; and baby clothes are often stained with milk stains, saliva stains, urine stains, odor, etc., and must be washed in time or by hand. In order to wash in time. 2. If the internal washing machine has not been cleaned for a long time, the fibers and scale of clothes will accumulate, and the environment inside the washing machine will be humid, which will form a hotbed for bacterial reproduction. Data show that the long-term use of unsterilized washing machine inner tank contains mold, E. coli and other pathogenic bacteria. Washing your baby’s clothes in such a washing machine will undoubtedly be harmful to your baby’s health. 3. If you really want to be lazy, you can buy a small washing machine for your baby. It is best to choose those with disinfection, drying and self-cleaning functions, which can be cleaned regularly to avoid secondary pollution. 3. It is of course best to choose a special detergent for children to wash baby clothes with clean water, but if you encounter difficult stains, you may still need to use a special, non-irritating detergent for babies. 1. The adult laundry detergent contains more chemical additives, which can irritate the baby’s skin and cause the baby’s body to appear red, swollen and itchy. In addition, the fragrance contained in the adult laundry detergent is very sensitizing and the thick fragrance is also easy to stimulate To the nasal mucosa of the baby. 2. Detergents for babies generally do not contain harmful chemicals, so it is best to use baby-specific ones for washing clothes, and remember to avoid choosing products with excessive fragrance / aromatic type. Note: When washing your baby’s clothes with detergent, you must finally rinse with running water until there is no foam at all, so as to minimize the residue. The baby’s clothes are best placed in the sun to ventilate and dry, do not dry in the bathroom, it is easy to breed bacteria. Ultraviolet rays in sunlight are natural fungicides, which can play a good role in disinfection. 4. Don’t use camphor pills Some mothers put camphor pills when they store clothes during the season to prevent insects and ants. However, please remember that after you have a baby, mothballs should not be stored with baby clothes, and it is best not to place them in the room where the baby lives. The active ingredients of camphor pills on the market are mainly naphthalene or p-dichlorobenzene, which can enter the blood through the skin. There is an enzyme in the adult body that can quickly form a non-toxic substance with it and be excreted with the urine. But babies (especially babies) have few enzymes that bind naphthalene. After contacting camphor pills or wearing clothes stored with camphor pills, naphthalene enters the body and destroys a large number of red blood cells.

Is it true that Shulan diagnosed the laundry worker or was infected by clothes? Look at the rational analysis of this article

The recent epidemic situation in China has ushered in some new changes. The imports from abroad have gradually decreased, but some sporadic and repeated situations have gradually appeared in the country. On May 7, a laundry worker in the Shulan City Public Security Bureau of Jilin Province was diagnosed with new coronavirus infection. Within the next few days, 15 related cases appeared among his close contacts. As for the source of the small-scale outbreak of the outbreak, so far, the official has not given a clear investigation conclusion. And where did the claim that the laundry worker was diagnosed with clothing infection come from? I checked it online and found that it was CCTV News 1 + 1 on the 11th, when I was connecting a disease control expert, I had some discussions. In order to facilitate analysis and discussion, we quote the specific dialogue content as follows: experts: a few days Previously, there was a research report on the virus content in the air. The researchers sampled the air in hospital patients’ wards and the semi-contaminated areas where doctors changed isolation suits, and the air in clean areas. In fact, the virus content in the air is higher, that is to say, if the medical staff is in the ward, his clothes may be infected with the virus. During the process of taking off, the virus content in the air is higher. Does this suggest that there are similar situations in Shulan’s cluster cases? These also provide a new idea for our analysis. Moderator: There is a folk saying that it is now determined that the case in Shulan is a laundry worker of the Public Security Bureau. The Public Security Bureau will be involved in picking up (Russian immigrants) from April 8th to 30th. Is it infected during the process of receiving the police clothes? Expert: There is such a possibility. There is really no need to over-interpret such a dialogue. At present, the source of the epidemic is still under investigation. Of course, various situations may occur. If you are asked whether it is a new coronavirus infection caused by contact with clothing, of course not Say “absolutely impossible”, but what experts say is possible, how likely is it? But it is also worth our in-depth thinking and discussion. Experts can have expert ideas and opinions, we do not need to make too much judgment on such a possibility. But does the virus really get on clothing and then spread to people through clothing? This possibility is possible, but it also requires many conditions to achieve such a communication channel. The example cited by the experts is that during the process when the medical staff in the hospital took off their isolation suits, the virus content in the air became high. I did not see this study, but I also saw a preprinted paper study, which was shown in Vulcan Mountain During the virus sampling research in the hospital, positive samples of new coronavirus were found in the soles of medical staff, cuffs of protective clothing, etc. Therefore, it can be said that the new coronavirus can be contaminated on clothing, but what needs to be considered is These studies are all based on the research of the New Coronary Ward of the hospital. Such a study has a very high risk and probability of contaminating the new coronavirus. Based on such a situation, there is of course the possibility that the new coronavirus will contaminate clothing. of. However, for this case in Shulan City, the staff of the staff who returned to the country was infected with the virus, and then arrived at the laundry, the virus can remain active, and then spread to the laundry worker during the laundry process, this possibility How big is it? What is the comparability between the air environment and the viral load in the new coronary ward of the hospital? Virus transmission requires not only a certain amount of load, but also a certain way. At present, the main transmission route of the new corona virus is respiratory transmission and contact transmission. If it is because the laundry is infected with the new corona virus, it is because of clothing. Has the virus spread into the air and spread through the respiratory tract? Or did you get the virus on your clothes and touch the virus? Under the current epidemic situation, how likely are the laundry workers to be completely exposed without gloves or masks? If you wear mask gloves while working, the possibility of infection caused by clothing will be further reduced. Therefore, through the above analysis, we can see that there may be the possibility of the new crown infection of the laundry workers being spread by clothing, but how much this possibility is, whether it is the true source of the epidemic, requires further research and discussion. Regarding the investigation of the source of this small-scale outbreak, it is recommended that you may open your mind more widely. Such a question is worthy of our consideration: Is the first confirmed patient definitely the source of the virus? In the subsequent diagnosis